|
||||
Jump to:
|
II Samuel
Chapter
14 {Note: RBT says that this is a change of feelings for David. In the last chapter David longed to see Absalom. David is now unstable - back in his arrogance complex. But Joab now knows that none of David's adult sons are capable of ruling Israle once David passes away. So, he is going to scheme to bring back Absalom. And, he is going to set up a scenario where 1) Absalom can return 2) Absalom will not be stoned to death when he returns, and 3) Absalom will be given over to Joab as his personal responsibility when he does return. So, we will see Joab will be given the 'responsibility' for Absalom when he is permitted to return to Jerusalem. That is why when David will order in the revolution that no one kill Absalom. Joab will violate this order - because HE was responsible for Joab and it was his right and responsibility to kill him when he revolted against David.}
{Verses
2-3: Joab Stages a Drama - A 3 Act Scenario}
{The
Full Rehearsal}
Consequently,
Joab put in her mouth these words {the script}.
{Woman's
Acting Before Supreme Court Judge King David} {Note: She had to practice falling to the ground just right. They she had to prostrate herself before David to look like the true damsel in distress. Finally, she does not lift her eyes to him or he might be able to tell she was faking. She is a very talented actress here, playing her role well! All real men desire to help a woman in need. This Act is intended to play on the emotions of King David.}
5~~And
the king said unto her, {Note: This is setting up the Law of Posterity - a civil law to ensure that a man's name would pass from generation to generation. It only applies to 'true widows' where the husband has died. It does not apply to 'grass widows' - those who are divorced from their husbands (making their husband's 'dead' to them under the law). Joab is setting up non-pertinent civil law where the case between Absalom and Amnon was a criminal matter.}
{Basis
for the Supposed Grievance}
6b~~Now
the two of them were fighting each other in the field,
Consequently,
the one stuck and killed the other.
{Note:
Now under the Jewish law, Amnon should have been tried
7a~~Now,
behold, the entire clan/family {Note: In Israel there were no public executioners. These close relatives would have been obligated to enforce the law and be 'avengers of blood'. And, this would also be the right of Amnon's 50ish brothers. This tells us that David has 'tried Absalom in abstentia' an Absalom would be executed by his brothers if he returned.} 7b~~Furthermore, we will destroy {shamad} the heir. {Note: Joab through this actress is introducing a false issue. That of the law of posterity - see Genesis 38:8. All the names of the families who escaped Egypt via the Exodus were to be perpetuated through the male heir. This is a very important civil law particularly since all lands were to return to the original families every 50 years - unless the line of posterity had been broken.} {Note: Now shamad here in the Hiphil stem indicates the false motivation of the supposed avengers of blood. Really, Joab is telling us the motivation of Amnon's 50 brothers in wanting Absalom now dead also - they all think then they would be the heir apparent. Their motivation is evil. Human good plus arrogance = evil (same as sin plus arrogance = evil)}
7c~~Therefore,
they {the avengers of blood} {Note: When a law is not pertinent, a person has to appeal to the emotion of the judge. And, since David is emotionally charged, he will fall for the trap. Therefore, again with Absalom as with Amnon, the punishment for his crime will not be imposed. When laws are not enforced, revolution will follow.} {Note: See Psalm 38:28. David probably wrote this psalm afterward this event to remind all of us that the prosperity of the evil SHOULD be cut off!}
8~~So
the king said to the woman,
"Go
home {an order} . . . and I will 'issue an order' . . . on your behalf {Note: This will set a legal precedent that will be used in Absalom's case to distort justice.}
{Verses
9-11: Act 1 Beginning of Dialog by which Absalom's Freedom will be Obtained} {Note: This is strange. David ruled incorrectly in her favor. Why this? What is SHE guilty of? Principal: when a woman in distress changes something and it does not make sense . . . BEWARE . . . you are about to be had!}
9b~~But
let both the king and his throne/government {Note: Now the woman saying to David 'it is NOT your fault' and David can not know HOW it ever could have been his fault!!! He has to be spinning mentally!}
10~~Then
the king replied, {Note: This is David's second bad decision. Not only did he allow his sympathy for this woman to allow a criminal to be pardoned and therefore no justice for the victim, but now, his second decision is to completely protect the criminal from society (so now who protects society? No one.)} {Note: Principals coming up: Crusaders plus criminals = revolution. Crusader arrogance plus human good = evil. Human good + evil = revolution.}
{David's
Solemn Oath Before the 'Higher Court'}
11b~~Consequently,
he replied, "By the life/essence of Jehovah/God, {Note: David is actually being prophetic about Absalom's death. His long hair will be caught in the trees and Joab will throw three javelins into him. No 'hair' fell to the ground. Absalom would go to the barber once a year and they would cut off about five pounds of red hair by the king's scales. He had become a 'long hair hippy type' once he decided to not respect the laws of the land.}
{Act
II - the Emotional View of the Law - the Plea for 'Criminal Rights'}
And
he {David} replied, "Speak."
{Distortion
of the Law}
For
since the king has rendered this judicial decision {Note: So by being gallant, David has taken the bait and fell into her trap. Principal: a woman in distress is not always a woman in distress - but a carefully baited trap to catch a sucker. They are saying David has issued now a 'blanket pardon' against all 'avengers of blood' so that applies to Absalom also . . . or he is 'discriminating'. She is saying that David is guilty until he pardons Absalom!}
14a~~And
we {pausing for emphasis} . . . {Note: This means 'you can not bring the victim back by killing his murderer. But you can save the life of the poor criminal who murdered him. But God says it is a very bad mistake for any society to forget the victim. Capital punishment eliminates one direct threat to society AND is a deterrent to other potential murders.}
{Ultimate
of Distorting Doctrine} {Note: Who has been 'driven away'? Absalom . . . a murder! She makes him sound like a hero! This last phrase is correct when one rebounds. But she is using 'non-pertinent doctrine' - grace is not the issue here. There is no indication that Absalom has rebounded his sin. Either way, God's law is capital punishment for 1st degree murder.}
{Act
III - How Distortion is Converted to Conspiracy and Conspiracy to Revolution}
Therefore,
your female subject thought . . .
Perhaps
. . .
16~~For
the king will agree/hear, to deliver his female subject
|